One Small Step for Large, Furry Men

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Bush to be Impeached?

(link) Impeachment hearings: The White House prepares for the worst The Bush administration is bracing for impeachment hearings in Congress. "A coalition in Congress is being formed to support impeachment," an administration source said. Sources said a prelude to the impeachment process could begin with hearings by the Senate Judiciary Committee in February. They said the hearings would focus on the secret electronic surveillance program and whether Mr. Bush violated the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Comment: I don't get my hopes up, yet using the ole phone ringy thing to call all appropriate MD representative Gov't officials wouldn't hurt. Might take 10-15 min.

Iris Scam

(link) Iris Scanning For New Jersey Grade School By Laurie Sullivan TechWeb.com Mon Jan 23, 6:34 PM ET
"When a parent arrives to pick up their child at one of three grade schools in the Freehold Borough School District, they'll need to look into a camera that will take a digital image of their iris. That photo will establish positive identification to gain entrance into the school.
Funding for the project, more than $369,000, was made possibly by a school safety grant through the National Institute of Justice, a research branch of the U.S. Department of Justice. "The idea is to improve school safety for the children," said Phil Meara, superintendent, Freehold Borough School District, on Monday. "We had a swipe-card system that operated the doors, but the technology was obsolete." [...]
Comment: Screw the Iris scam crap. I say go right to the chipping of the parents.

No Child Left Behind

(link) Mining for kids: Children can’t "opt out" of Pentagon recruitment database By Kathryn Casa Vermont Guardian posted January 17, 2006
"Parents cannot remove their children’s names from a Pentagon database that includes highly personal information used to attract military recruits, the Vermont Guardian has learned.
The Pentagon has spent more than $70.5 million on market research, national advertising, website development, and management of the Joint Advertising Market Research and Studies (JAMRS) database — a storehouse of questionable legality that includes the names and personal details of more than 30 million U.S. children and young people between the ages of 16 and 23.
The database is separate from information collected from schools that receive federal education money. The No Child Left Behind Act requires schools to report the names, addresses, and phone numbers of secondary school students to recruiters, but the law also specifies that parents or guardians may write a letter to the school asking that their children’s names not be released." [...]
Comment: Damn right, NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND!!! Looks like its working as planned. Dumb them down to sign them up.

Global Warming or the Next Ice Age?

(link) Europe chilled to the bone by Artic freeze "Europe's relentless deep freeze, with sub-zero temperatures as far south as Sicily, claimed several dozen more victims, while closing schools and disrupting air, road and sea traffic.
Temperatures as low as minus 36 degrees Celsius (minus 33 degrees Fahrenheit) crippled power grids, burst frozen water pipes and caused thousands of road accidents in a swath of eastern Europe from the Baltic states in the north to Turkey, Greece and Italy." [...]
Comment: Has anyone noticed that Europe/Russia etc looks to be entering the next ice age?

Voting System Flawed (or Fraud)

(link) As Elections Near, Officials Challenge Balloting Security In Controlled Test, Results Are Manipulated in Florida System By Zachary Goldfarb Special to The Washington Post Sunday, January 22, 2006; A06 "As the Leon County supervisor of elections, Ion Sancho's job is to make sure voting is free of fraud. But the most brazen effort lately to manipulate election results in this Florida locality was carried out by Sancho himself.
Four times over the past year Sancho told computer specialists to break in to his voting system. And on all four occasions they did, changing results with what the specialists described as relatively unsophisticated hacking techniques. To Sancho, the results showed the vulnerability of voting equipment manufactured by Ohio-based Diebold Election Systems, which is used by Leon County and many other jurisdictions around the country." [...]
Comment: "The head of a company vying to sell voting machines in Ohio told Republicans in a recent fund-raising letter that he is "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." [...] (link) Yep, Bush won alright. Was there anything strange going on in Ohio in 2004 that we might like to know about? (link) (link) (link) Won't see this stuff on TV.

New Mexico to Ban Aspertame

(link) New Mexico Begins Legislative Process To Ban Aspartame Fifteen state senators sponsored a bill to rid New Mexico of what some have called "Rumsfeld's Disease." 20 Jan 2006 By Greg Szymanski
"A senate bill to rid New Mexico of what has been called "Rumsfeld’s Disease" was introduced Thursday by Sen. Gerald Ortiz y Pino, D-Albuquerque, as 15 other senators from both sides of isle also signed on, supporting legislation to ban the deadly artificial sweetener, aspartame.
Linked to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for his efforts in the 1970s for putting the sweetener on the market, New Mexico is the first state to consider banning the artificial additive linked to numerous ill-health affects, including cancer.
If passed, no food containing any amount of the sweetener could be manufactured, sold or delivered in Mew Mexico, beginning July 1." [...]
Comment: What Rumsfeld's efforts?! What the... Check out the history of how Aspartame was approved by the FDA (link) .
"Donald Rumsfeld, who was a former member of the U.S. Congress and the Chief of Staff in the Gerald Ford Administration, was hired as G.D. Searle's President. Attorney James Turner, Esq. alleged that G.D. Searle hired Rumsfeld to handle the aspartame approval difficulties as a "legal problem rather than a scientific problem." (US Senate 1987).
Rumsfeld hired: John Robson as Executive Vice President. He was a former lawyer with Sidley and Austin, Searle's Law Firm and also served as chairman of the Civil Aeronautics Board, which was then connect to the Department of Transportation." [...]
"Donald Rumsfeld is now on the Board of Directors of the Chicago Tribune which recently wrote a glowing article about the NutraSweet Company." [...]
"On January 21, 1981, the day after Ronald Reagan takes office as U.S. President, G.D. Searle reapplied for the approval of aspartame. G.D. Searle submits several new studies along with their application. It was believed that Reagan would certainly replace Jere Goyan, the FDA Commissioner.
G.D. Searle president, Donald Rumsfeld's connections to the Republican party were also thought to play a part in Searle's decision to reapply for aspartame's approval on the day after Ronald Reagan was inaugurated (Gordon 1987, page 499 of US Senate 1987).
According to a former G.D. Searle salesperson, Patty Wood- Allott, G.D. Searle president, Donald Rumsfeld told his sales force that, if necessary, "he would call in all his markers and that no matter what, he would see to it that aspartame would be approved that year." (Gordon 1987, page 499 of US Senate 1987)" [...]
Take another swig of that poison death diet cola or the thousands of other products containing Aspartame if you wish. I for one don't want to have (link)

Warrantless Wiretaps

(link) January 24, 2006 -- Hayden Ducks Questions On NSA Whistleblowing, Says Three Top NSA Lawyers Reviewed and Approved Bush Warrantless Wiretap Program. "Speaking yesterday at the National Press Club in Washington, Deputy Director of National Intelligence Gen. Michael Hayden said that when President Bush issued his order on warrantless wiretaps by the NSA of U.S. persons, Hayden consulted separately with three NSA lawyers who concluded that the eavesdropping program was legal. Essentially, three NSA lawyers determined the legality and constitutionality of a presidential order, trumping the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court set up in 1978 to deal with NSA wiretaps of "U.S. persons" and the oversight committees of Congress that are charged with ensuring the president and the Executive branch adhere to the Constitution and the duly-enacted laws of the United States. The three NSA lawyers concluded that a non-FISA and warrantless predicate of "reasonable belief" was as legal as a FISA "probable cause" warrant in order to conduct surveillance of U.S. persons.
However, Hayden’s three NSA lawyers apparently did not know enough about the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution to adequately brief him on the probable cause predicate. The following question was asked by Jonathan Landy of Knight-Ridder: "I'm no lawyer, but my understanding is that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution specifies that you must have probable cause to be able to do a search that does not violate an American's right against unlawful searches and seizures." Hayden said of the Fourth Amendment: "The amendment says unreasonable search and seizure." Landy: "But does it not say probable [cause]?" Hayden: "No. The amendment says . . . unreasonable search and seizure."
It is apparent that contrary to Hayden's statement, neither he nor his NSA attorneys are familiar with the Fourth Amendment, which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." [...]
Comment: For shame good General. Taking an Oath to something he doesn't either understand or follow. What's this "reasonable belief" BS? I'd say that the good General is either lying or incompetent or a third choice pointing out the obvious so that it is obvious that he is a deceiver.

Military Not Able to Meet Recruiting Quota

(link) The Military Recruiter's Lament By Scott Ritter01/18/06 "AlterNet" -- -- "It should come as no surprise to any observer of modern America that U.S. military recruiters are having a difficult time meeting their quotas. Last year, the U.S. Army fell 6,600 recruits short of its goal to enlist 80,000 new soldiers. An increase in recruitment incentives, including signing bonuses and increases in college scholarships, combined with the raising of the minimum enlistment age (to 39) and allowing high school dropouts to be recruited, have not helped reverse the tide. Even the vaunted U.S. Marines, the pinnacle of the all-volunteer U.S. military, which has prided itself on its ability to attract recruits with slogans like "If everyone could be a Marine, there wouldn't be Marines" versus money and other recruiting gimmickry, have failed to make their enlistment quota." [...]
"Americans aren't afraid to put their lives on the line for a worthy cause. It is not military service that is being rejected, but rather military service in support of a cause not deemed worthy of the sacrifice expected. The military today has degenerated into an entity that is viewed by many in the American public as no longer serving the larger interests of the American people, but rather the play toy of a political elite who use the U.S. military as a tool to impose their ideology on others around the world, as opposed to "upholding and defending the Constitution of the United States," the mission assumed when one is sworn into military service." [...]
Comment: Amen. Another older view from a two time Medal of Honor winner and Marine Corps General can be found here (link). Ah yes, the oath I once took included "I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic and I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same." The question I never asked but maybe should have is what do you do in defense of domestic enemies... Maybe the fine gentlemen General Hayden, Deputy Director of National Intelligence, will fill us in on the Constitution and the Oath he took as an officer at least 10 times to rise to the rank of full General (four stars baby - Oh yeah!).


Crazy Weather/Earth

Did anyone hear that monster lightning bolt/thunder that hit last night right at 10 pm (link)? I thought the house was going to fall down. Thunderstorm in January (with flurries)? Made me think about a list I had been compiling since I was in Seattle and had emailed to some people in the past that in my mind gives indications that the world is a changing whether due to classic global warming theories, some other theories or a combination of numerous theories.

Here are a few places that keep track of the changing weather:
(link) The Boom Shelter (link) Signs of the Times

- Snow for the first time ever in the UAE (link)
- LA / California nearing all time record rain fall and we still have over half a year to go (link)
- Mt Kilimanjaro snow almost gone (First time in about 11,000 years) (link)
- The Gulf Stream is slowing (first signs showing now) (link)
- Local: We have a bad draught here, snow pack was about 10% of normal. Maybe a big fire season up here. (link)
- Local: The Salmon run only about 10% of usual in the Columbia river. No one knows why.(link)
- Dead Zones in the sea increasing (most notably Gulf of Mexico appears early this year.) (link)
- Snow for the first time ever in Somalia (link)
- Crack in earth TX (link)
- Hot earth unexplained (link)
- Dead fish (link)
- Plankton disappearing 18 July 05 (link)
- Sea life problems 13 July 05 Warmer Ocean (link)

New/Updated
- Deep freeze in EurAisa (link)
- 2005 Warmest year on record (link)
- Oklahoma gassing (link)
- Seattle nearly set record rainfall (link)

Baffled Scientists Say Less Sunlight Reaching Earth (link) By LiveScience Managing Editor posted: 24 January 2006"After dropping for about 15 years, the amount of sunlight Earth reflects back into space, called albedo, has increased since 2000, a new study concludes. That means less energy is reaching the surface. Yet global temperatures have not cooled during the period. Increasing cloud cover seems to be the reason, but there must also be some other change in the clouds that's not yet understood. "The data also reveal that from 2000 to now the clouds have changed so that the Earth may continue warming, even with declining sunlight," said study leader Philip R. Goode of the New Jersey Institute of Technology. "These large and peculiar variabilities of the clouds, coupled with a resulting increasing albedo, presents a fundamental, unmet challenge for all scientists who wish to understand and predict the Earth's climate." [...]

Comment: Well this article states that Scientists don't know why clouds are increasing. It fails to mention that there are theories for why the cloud cover is increasing. (Note: The first reference is lengthy and I haven't fully investigated it - adding it here to show theories do exist to explain cloud cover.)

(link) The Effects of Galactic Cosmic Rays on Weather and Climate on Multiple Time Scales September 14, 2002 Abstract
"In this article, evidence is presented that galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) are a major forcing agent on weather and climate on multiple time scales ranging from weekly through glacial-interglacial. Known effects of GCRs are used to explain phenomena and observations in the fields of meteorology, climatology, paleoclimatology and paleoecology. Evidence is presented that primary effects of increases in levels of GCRs are increases in the amounts of low clouds- especially over the tropics, increases in the albedo of low clouds and decreases of the temperature of and increases of the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex." [...]

(link) Cosmic rays 'linked to clouds' By Alex Kirby BBC News Online environment correspondent "German scientists have found a significant piece of evidence linking cosmic rays to climate change. They have detected charged particle clusters in the lower atmosphere that were probably caused by the space radiation. They say the clusters can lead to the condensed nuclei which form into dense clouds. Clouds play a major, but as yet not fully understood, role in the dynamics of the climate, with some types acting to cool the planet and others warming it up. The amount of cosmic rays reaching Earth is largely controlled by the Sun, and many solar scientists believe the star's indirect influence on Earth's global climate has been underestimated." [...]

(link) Columbia Crew Catches A Mysterious TIGER In The Indian Ocean
WASHINGTON -- "An unprecedented flash observed by the space shuttle Columbia crew in 2003 over the Indian Ocean may be a new type of transient luminous event, like lightning sprites, but one that is not necessarily caused by a thunderstorm. The discharge was observed less than two weeks before the shuttle was lost during its Earth reentry." [...]

(link) Cosmic raise in cloud New evidence that events in outer space affect the weather and climate of Earth has been revealed in a study by meteorologists at the University of Reading published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society on Wednesday 18 January. "In their paper ‘Empirical evidence for a non-linear effect of galactic cosmic rays on clouds’, Drs Giles Harrison and David Stephenson suggest that cosmic rays have a significant effect on the Earth’s lower atmosphere – particularly on levels of cloudiness." [...]

(link) Unknown Energy Surges Continue to Hit Planet, Global Weather Systems in Chaos By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to the Russian Academy of Sciences
"An increasingly panicked global effort is now underway by the worlds top scientists to understand an unprecedented series of ‘blasts’, energy surges, which the planet has been taking from as an yet unknown source which has been bombarding Antarctica with cosmic rays and disrupting Northern Hemisphere weather systems on a global scale." [...]

Comment: Track Gamma Ray Burst at home. Fun for the whole family. (link)

Liberty for Security?


"Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither" - Ben Franklin

This was the message sent to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales yesterday at a public address at Georgetown University as students stood up in silent protest and turned their backs to Gonzales.

Gonzales's speech is part of the Bush adminstration's effort to defend a program that allows the NSA to monitor calls to and from the US without warrants. Many experts on national security and intelligence law say the president has been in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (the Congressional Research Service came to the same conclusion).

The problem with allowing the NSA to essentially listen to whatever they want, when they want, is multifaceted, but basically boils down to this - Once we allow our freedoms to be removed, even in the face of adversity, it becomes very easy to use that 'liberty caveat' against people in ways that were not originally intended. In fact, we've already seen this in the case of the Patriot Act being used against people downloading songs, or writing bad checks. Are you a terrorist for downloading an MP3? (link)

Links to the story:
- NPR
- Chicago Tribune
- Insomnia Blog

More Commentary
- Signs of the times
- ADITE

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Police that don't need Warrants?

I was going to write something about Money - how it is created, the Federal Reserve, Economics, Doom(?) via Iran Oil Bourse and how it all ties together (may write about Economics in general soon), but I'd rather post this other stuff because other people have done a pretty good job already of tying it all together (link). So here we go as I drink a Natty Boh!

(link) Unfathomed Dangers in Patriot Act Reauthorization Patriot Police By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS "A provision in the "Patriot Act" creates a new federal police force with power to violate the Bill of Rights. You might think that this cannot be true as you have not read about it in newspapers or heard it discussed by talking heads on TV.
Go to House Report 109-333 -USA PATRIOT IMPROVEMENT AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2005 and check it out for yourself. Sec. 605 reads:
"There is hereby created and established a permanent police force, to be known as the 'United States Secret Service Uniformed Division'."
This new federal police force is "subject to the supervision of the Secretary of Homeland Security."
The new police are empowered to "make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony."
The new police are assigned a variety of jurisdictions, including "an event designated under section 3056(e) of title 18 as a special event of national significance" (SENS).
"A special event of national significance" is neither defined nor does it require the presence of a "protected person" such as the president in order to trigger it. Thus, the administration, and perhaps the police themselves, can place the SENS designation on any event. Once a SENS designation is placed on an event, the new federal police are empowered to keep out and to arrest people at their discretion.
The language conveys enormous discretionary and arbitrary powers. What is "an offense against the United States"? What are "reasonable grounds"?
You can bet that the Alito/Roberts court will rule that it is whatever the executive branch says. [...]
Comment: Some people look at me crazy when I tell them that the Jackboots or Gestapo is soon to be on the march. Speaking of which for good ole Alito - What has Alito said in the past that would make me have a nice, cozy feeling about his upcoming confirmation hearing decision? "top officials should not be subject to lawsuits in any circumstances, including when they knowingly violated the law." Ohh good, I was worried there. So who wrote this last quote about Alito? "Rosenbaum’s final Times piece, published in late December, revealed that Samuel Alito Jr., Bush’s Supreme Court nominee, had written a 1984 memorandum as a government lawyer in the Reagan administration "arguing that top officials should not be subject to lawsuits in any circumstances, including when they knowingly violated the law." (link) In case you didn't hear, Mr. Rosenbaum was murdered in a robbery(?) shortly after his article. Mighty strange robbery. (link) (link)

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Stolen Childhoods, Part 2


Please see Part 1 of this post.

Child labor is a complicated issue, and is the result of failures in political, economic, cultural and religious systems. In Part 2, I will discuss what you can do to help impact problems in one or more of the systems.

  1. learn about the issue. Here are a few links to organizations working to eliminate child labor
  2. Do not purchase products that are produced using child labor. This can be suprisingly difficult, as so many of the products sold in the US are produced directly or indirectly using child labor. Here are a few links to sites with more information on where products come from and how they are produced.
  3. Get involved
      • write to your Senators and Congressman inform them on the problem of child labor, and let them know you want the US to do something about it (find your congressman)
      • write to companies that knowingly use child labor
      • donate to a charity aimed at solving the problem of child labor worldwide

Monday, January 16, 2006

Knowing your risk


This article regarding Adjustable Rate Mortages (ARM's) highlights the problem of individuals being extremely financially leveraged in the real estate market without fully understanding their level of financial risk. This could lead to drastic changes in the overall housing market (see links below about a possible housing bubble) .


The full article (link) with my comments below:


Clock is running down on 'cheap' mortgages Now comes the hard part for holders of certain loans.

You know those cheap mortgages that everybody's been getting to speculate on housing? Where somebody at the other end of a toll-free phone will lend you $200,000 and your payment will only be $678 per month?Lenders who started making those teaser-rate loans a few years ago are getting ready to charge real-world payments on them.Starting in 2006 and accelerating into 2007, as much as $2.5 trillion worth of the fancy mortgages called "hybrids" are coming to the end of the free-lunch part of the deal.And while prices in Southwest Florida are hovering at twice those of three years ago, the house party seems to have ended in July. Since then, as mortgage rates continue their upward creep, inventories are stacking up, while the rate of closings is slowing down.The best-case scenario for the future, the one from the real estate agents, is that prices will level out to single-digit appreciation rates.Assuming that scenario, some would-be investors -- those who took out highly leveraged loans with extremely low payment options -- could soon find themselves owing more on a house than it is worth. Comment: Meaning will they be able to afford the higher monthly payment? If not, what will they do? Refinance (if available and most likely leading to a higher monthly payment if they refi - will they be able to afford the payment) Sell the place to get out of the bad situation they have placed themselves in - possibly leading to more places on the market (factor in that the exotic loans will most likely go away) meaning more supply then demand ("inventories are stacking up") - leading to falling housing prices. Also the speed or some might say liquidity of the market is slowing - not a good sign for any bubble type investment.
That's called being "upside down" in a loan.Many more will simply find that their monthly bill has instantly risen by roughly the amount of a car loan. The reason is that after their initial one-, two- or five-year interest, their loans are now scheduled to "reset" at more realistic rates, and will continue to do so, usually for the life of the loan.Economists are still trying to put numbers on this reset factor, particularly when it comes to the riskiest home loans, referred to as "sub-prime.""We don't have enough data to know how big a problem this will be," said David Berson, chief economist at Fannie Mae, the nation's largest mortgage packager.For now, though, the lending party is still going strong."The mortgage business has been banging for the last five, six years," said Marta Grande, managing broker at Sarasota's Commonwealth Mortgage. "It has just gone crazy."Personally, Grande likes what a borrower can do with an adjustable-rate mortgage, or "ARM.""I've owned six homes, and every one of them has been an ARM. But I tell people today to get a fixed because I think rates are going to go up."The ticking clockSarasota's John Barron is typical of the new crop of homeowner-investors. He and his wife, Lauren Wood, are sitting on big profits at their two 2004 purchases in the up-and-coming Gillespie Park neighborhood, close to downtown Sarasota.But the couple made their big moves using ARMs that are about to be reset. If they don't act soon, their monthly bills will rise by hundreds of dollars per month.They used two separate three-year, interest-only, adjustable-rate mortgages from SunTrust Bank to buy the homes within the past two years.And there's more, Barron said."Besides the two ARMs, we also took out a home equity line on the Seventh Street house to put down a deposit on the Fifth Street house. There was no cash that we had in our pockets to put down on the Fifth Street house. All we had was our shining credit record. And the faith that the banks have in this real estate market that allows you to borrow 100 percent."If they don't sell, with interest rates rising, the couple will have to refinance the loans. Comment: At the end of the article, this issue of refinancing comes up - what if they are unable to secure a new loan? and besides that the loan if at 30 yr fixed is going to have a significantly higher monthly payment, again will they be able to afford it?
Barron and Wood have a lot of company, says Paul Kasriel, chief economist at Chicago-based Northern Trust.With possibly $2.5 trillion in household debt that is going to be repriced higher "the household debt-service ratio is bound to climb to new highs," Kasriel wrote last month.Even before the reset gets under way, households were devoting a record 13.75 percent of their after-tax income to servicing debt, including mortgage debt.And the screaming housing boom of the last three years?"There will be an end to it. I think it is going to be related to further increases in interest rates," Kasriel said during an interview. Comments: possibly, the Fed is raising short term rates to try and slow the superheating housing and credit markets (getting rid of cheap credit) that they themselves fostered as a last pitch effort to save the house (financial/economic system) now by making money/credit super cheap (lowered Fed fund rate to around 1%) only to burn it hotter and faster latter, but in essense the system (financial etc) is close to breaking and some would argue that the Fed has lost control or can do very little to influence the situation. Personally, I think home loan interest rates will go up and exaccerbate the somewhat hidden flaws in the housing market and other markets (ie the risk associated with ARMs coming due). Long term bonds, short term bonds, gold and other financial instruments are all giving different signals as to what is happening. A lot of confusion in terms of how the system worked in the past because it doesn't seem to be working the same now. That gets into a different topic, but really it all connects.
"Asset bubbles are characterized by cheap credit. Usually what bursts a bubble is higher cost of credit, because that is what inflates the bubble, is cheap credit."Risky but not riskiestIn the Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice region, prices for existing single-family homes have risen at one of the fastest clips in the nation during the past three years.Prices in Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice have risen 93 percent, a rate roughly triple the national average and well ahead of the 79 percent growth rate for the top 20 metro areas in the nation.But the feverish activity seems to have dried up.In July, only 1,626 existing single-family homes were available for sale in the Sarasota market, and Realtors were closing sales at the rate of 156 per week. Dividing that sales rate into the number of listings, it was a 10.4-week supply of homes.By mid-December, though, the picture had changed dramatically. Sales had slowed to a rate of 100 per week while listings rose more than 170 percent. Comment: Showing atleast in this area that the housing market is in the process of turning over - much like Boston and other West Coast hot markets (ultimately forms into a buyers market, but when to get in? If it is for investment purposes, not when it is stagnant or on its way down but at the bottom - long time/way to go if the market has really turned in my opinion).Even so, National Association of Realtors researchers are cheery about the future of Southwest Florida property because of several factors: a strong job market, the continuing influx of wealthy retirees and, in their view, the acceptable degree to which the market is leveraged in loans. Comment: May be a great job market down there, but I think I know what other areas of the country are feeling or the country as a whole is feeling - jobs leaving the country (think GM, Ford and the outsourcing of jobs overseas) and general wages falling in relation to inflation - people are loosing purchasing power (they make near the same amount, yet prices for stuff - food, gas, housing, education, medical care, etc - are going up)
NAR measures mortgage risk as "mortgage servicing cost relative to the median income."For Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, that ratio stands at 24 percent, higher than the 16 percent national average but well below the 30 percent for the top 20 metropolitan areas.The NAR concludes that the Sarasota loan level "implies no widespread financial overstretching to purchase a home in the region." But the organization admits that "there is no good data on ARMs or interest-only loans for the local market" and grants that "there have been some reporting in the media of a higher use of these loans in recent years compared to the past." Comment: So NAR say earlier that the market isn't excessively leveraged, but now they say there is "no good data on ARMs",etc which is one very big portion and good way to see if the market is leveraged. Laughable. Refer further down in the article. Way more ARMs conpared to fixed rate, etc.
The house specialtyLocal mortgage brokers are perfectly willing to add to the preponderance of evidence about high-leverage mortgages.At Sarasota's Integrity Mortgage Group, ARMs have far and away taken over as the most popular.Five years ago, there was only an occasional one-year or five-year ARM."Out of 200 loans you'd do 10 adjustables," Integrity President Jason Thurber said. "In the last year, I've probably done five fixed-rate loans, 30- or 15-year, out of 150 loans. So all the rest are some kind of hybrid." Comment: People are exposed to the risk of higher payments that will eventually arrive with their ARM, if they do not have a good understanding and plan ahead ("I will refi" to me is not a plan, but wishful thinking. It may mean significantly higher payments anyway or the new loan may not be available). Do people realize their risk? Will there be an OH s___! moment when their monthly payment goes up and can they afford or for how long can they afford the higher payments? This in some ways could be the linch pin question. What would be your reaction to an Oh s___ moment - mine would be to sell the risk away, even at a loss. Could this influence the market if it happens in a cascading or even in a more frequent fashion? most definitely.
The big picture looks similar, says SMR Research of Hackettstown, N.J., which regularly surveys lenders who make 90 percent of America's home loans."I can say that the first half of this year, ARM share was 55 percent nationally," said SMR's George Yacik. "For the full year 2004, it was 50 percent."Surprisingly, that shift toward adjustables has happened in an environment in which fixed-rate loans are extremely attractive, Yacik said. Comment: Why?, because a lot of the people wouldn't be able to afford the payment on the fixed loan. Hence they are most likely over leveraged with the ARM they have and may not even realize it. Another reason could be that they can make the payment on a 30 yr fixed but rather have a lower payment now and shoulder the additional risk. I worked with a woman in Seattle that tried for a few years to qualify for a loan but could not and I didn't think should have become a homeowner in her current financial situation. Enter in the exotic loan and she could qualify and did buy a home. Her answer to my question of what she would do when her ARM came due - I will Refi. Maybe and hopefully she will be able (A few months later I sold my place - this was one of the reasons. I was a little early to leave the market) The info below spells out how this could spell trouble for people.
Even after a year of moderate increases, the 63/8 percent you can lock on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is much closer to a 50-year low than to any high.Making matters worse, it is the the sub-prime lenders issuing the most adjustable-rate mortgages. With those who participate in the survey, 80 percent of their loans were ARMs compared to 55 percent in the broader market.So when do these loans adjust?Surprisingly, there is little data that is publicly available on that subject. The best resource is a study conducted in the spring by Fannie Mae, a federally chartered corporation that buys mortgages after lenders have issued them. Fannie Mae looked at 2002-2004 loan data to determine what portion of the existing loan pool would be "adjusted," and when.Fewer than 10 percent of the conventional conforming loans will reset in 2006-2007, but nearly two-thirds of sub-prime loans will. That is because a large portion of the sub-prime loans are two-year adjustables, says Berson, the Fannie Mae chief economist.Berson offered a typical example of what the industry calls a "2-28," an ARM in which the interest rate is fixed for the first two years and then adjusts regularly for the next 28 to whatever index the loan calls for. The average yearly cap on this loan is 2.3 percentage points per year.If the consumer took out this two-year ARM in December 2003, he started out paying a typical rate of 7.7 percent, Berson said."You would be getting a letter from your lender this month telling you that next month, your rate would be going to 10 percent."Roughly speaking, a consumer's monthly bill could rise from $330 to as much as $1,425 to $1,755.If the loan started out as interest-only, the shift in payments would be even larger.Fannie Mae expects sub-prime loans to be reset en masse this year with that trend continuing into 2007.But over at the Mortgage Bankers Association, senior economist Michael Fratantoni is more interested in the five-year adjustables that were issued during the refi craze of 2002-03. That's a large crop that will sprout in 2007."The estimate is that in 2007, more than a trillion dollars worth of hybrids are going to hit their first reset date," he said.That one chunk of hybrid loans represents 12 percent of the $8.8 trillion in single-family home loans outstanding nationwide.The genesisTo find fixed-rate mortgages as cheap as the 5.83 percent average of 2003-04, you'd have to go back to the 1950s and early '60s.Starting in 2003 and accelerating into 2004, lenders in 2003 began adding enticements to make ARMs an offer that consumers would find hard to refuse. Comment: Lenders don't just give out candy. They make money when others don't understand the risk and get caught. Think of this as a larger scale version (yet not an exact version) of where a person with a lot of credit card debt finds themself. Stuck paying the >18 some odd % interest and making little or no head way paying down their debt. They are pretty much slaves to their debt or debt owners (look at the new bankruptcies laws that took effect in Oct 05 and how this affects people that make financial mistakes).
"You had lenders with large origination machines running full tilt, and they decided to keep those machines running, so they started to push more heavily," said Keith T. Gumbinger, vice president of mortgage data publisher HSH Associates.Lenders started by adding the interest-only feature to basic adjustable-rate mortgages such as the 2-28.With interest-only, the lender is telling the mortgagee not to worry about principal payments at first, but after the freebie years have ended, the borrower is stuck paying the entire principal in a compressed 28-year time frame.Other marketing features gradually found their way into the market. "No doc" loans, now quite common, mean the borrower doesn't have to provide any documentation that he has earnings, such as paycheck stubs.Lenders started covering for lack of downpayments by making "piggyback loans" where they issue a first mortgage covering 80 percent of the purchase price, and then either a second mortgage or an equity line covering the remaining 20 percent."Everybody goes away pretty happy," Gumbinger said. "With the exception that there is a property out there that is mortgaged to 100 percent of its price."Like many ARM borrowers, Barron, the Gillespie Park buyer, is not really sure how much his payment will go up when the loans are reset. The new rate is a moving target."Come year four, they adjust it based on the prime rate," he said. "It is like prime rate plus two, or, I can't remember exactly what the adjustment is. They can never raise it more than 2 percentage points. That can add up pretty fast." Comment: Good luck to this person
'Neg Am'Now, lenders are pushing an exotic mortgage that is so leveraged it makes Barron's straight adjustables look tame.Just like it sounds, the option ARM gives the borrower a set of optional payments to choose from each month, ranging from minimal to hefty."It sounds like a product that some derelict accounting firm would come up with, but it makes sense for some workers," said Mark Vitner, Wachovia Bank's senior economist.Option ARMs were designed for people who are highly compensated but receive their income in chunks, such as Realtors, but they are now "being used much more widely than it was ever intended," Vitner said.At Washington Mutual's Bee Ridge Road office in Sarasota, 25 percent of current applications are for option ARMs, says senior loan consultant Mike Bangasser.The interest rate on the bank's "one-month option ARM" changes monthly based on a moving average of one-year Treasury bills, with the only limit a lifetime cap of 9.95 percent.For customers with good credit, there is only about a half-percentage point difference between the 5.75 percent rate on an option ARM and the 6.375 percent rate on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage.So why bother with the ARM?This is the key: The minimum payment today on a $200,000 option ARM would be only $678, a little more than half the cost on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan. On that $200,000 loan, a 30-year fixed would be $1,248 per month in principal and interest. With the option ARM, there are three other payment choices: $958, $1,167 or $1,661.The $678 payment doesn't even cover all the interest, Bangasser acknowledged."Granted, your mortgage balance is going to go up under this scenario, but as long as my property is appreciating, I personally don't care too much what my mortgage balance is." Comment: Let the good times roll! Party like it is 1999! but in no way consider or factor in that housing will ever (Gasp!) go down in price.
If a borrower decided to pay $978 this month, that would cover only interest. The $1,167 would cover principal and interest, as if the loan were amortized over the usual 30 years. The high-end payment of $1,661 "is a 15-year amortization and that would choke a horse," Bangasser said.Not covering the interest on a loan is referred to in the industry as negative amortization, "neg am" for short.The loan gets bigger over time. Usually when it reaches some pre-determined top, like 115 percent the value of the underlying property, the lender forces the borrower to pay the loan's real price, or to refinance it, says Grande of Commonwealth Mortgage.In the meantime, the borrower is "paying juice on the juice," adds Thurber of Integrity Mortgage.He guesstimated that if somebody borrowed $250,000 on a typical option ARM and made minimal payments for five years they would be "going to be in the hole 15 percent to 20 percent of your original balance, meaning $285,000 to $300,000.""You don't have to have negative am," Grande said. "As long as you make that fully-indexed payment, you're fine. But most folks aren't doing that. They take the easy way out, get themselves in trouble."There is one more ingredient to add to this layer cake, and it is one that barely occurs to most borrowers today: What if someday, loans were difficult to get?"Consumers have become so accustomed to very liquid mortgage markets, where credit is available for almost any circumstance, that they are not aware this is unusual in the market," HSH's Gumbinger warned. "Somewhat tighter credit availability and somewhat higher interest rates are much more normal." Comment: Yes, liquidity is an important thing to consider. What if it starts to dry up? If times turn sour or the risks to great, lenders/banks will tighten lending standards.
"Borrowers think they can always refinance. That is not always a safe bet."

Source: Hearldtribune.com


A decent overview about the question of housing bubble:
http://www.investorsinsight.com/otb_va_print.aspx?EditionID=256

Blog that posts most current articles on Housing (Worth taking a look at the Comments to the post - The 'Shape Of The Decline In 2006') :
http://thehousingbubble2.blogspot.com/

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Stolen Childhoods, Part 1


Recently, I watched a documentary titled Stolen Childhoods produced and directed by Len Morris. The film is the first to focus on the enormous problem of global child labor. The film features the stories of children forced to work in stone quarries and brick kilns in Nepal and Pakistan, carpet shops in India, jamals (fishing platforms) in the Sea of Sumatra off the coast of Indonesia, Coffee fields in Kenya, dumps in Brazil, tobacco plantations and the streets (prostitution) in Mexico, and even farms in the United States. Also included are interviews with people from around the world who understand the problem of child labor, and are working to eliminate it including Tom Harkin (U.S Senator), Bruce Harris, Pharis Harvey, Inderjit Khurana, Wangar Maathai (2004 Nobel Peace Prize winner), and Kailash Satyarthi.

I was previously aware that child labor existed in certain parts of the world, but had no idea of the shear magnitude of the issue. Worldwide, it is estimated that 246 million children are subjected to slave and bonded labor. 246 million. To put that in perspective, 246 million is approximately the population of the United States.

Why? Why are people choosing to force children to work? Why are governments and law enforcement agencies turning a blind eye?

In a word - money.

The pursuit of making money is the driver for business owners to force children into labor, because children will work hard for little or no money, increasing their profit margin. Lack of money is the reason families around the world 'sell' their children to business owners. When faced with the prospect of allowing their entire family to starve, or to give up one child so that they may feed their other children, parents are forced to choose the lesser of two evils and lose a child to labor. In some cases, older children make the choice on their own - they leave their home in pursuit of work so they can help their otherwise desperate and impoverished families. Kickbacks and payoffs keep governments from intervening. Lending 3rd world countries money to help alleviate the poverty that drives child labor has also served to perpetuate the problem.

From 1996 to 1999, corrupt officials in the Kenyan government mismanaged funds leant to Kenya by the IMF and World Bank. Because of the strict repayment schedule outlined in the loans, Kenya was left with no money, little resources, and a huge national debt. The Kenyan government initiated its own economic recovery strategy, which includes sharing the debt with the public in the form of charging families to send their children to school. Many families are unable to pay and are forced to take their children out of school and send them to the coffee fields, where they are forced to work long hours, are exposed to dangerous, cancer-causing pesticides, and earn very low wages. The problem is amplified by the greed of the businesses that purchase the coffee (many of them American). These businesses conspire to keep the amount they pay to Kenyan farmers low, while continuing to increase the mark up on the sale price (as much as 4000%).

Aside from inhumane and moral problems with enslaving children to work, it is important to consider the long term effects that child labor has on a community. When poor countries turn to forcing children to work an economic downward spiral occurs. Adult workers are replaced with children, putting the adults out of work and with little or no means for providing for their basic needs. The children forced into labor are removed from school and offered very little or no education. Eventually the children grow up and are left with no education and no real skills. In addition, children enslaved to work are not afforded an opportunity to develop mentally and emotionally, and are left with little self-worth and other conditions caused by years of neglect and abuse. This cycle repeats and, over time, the country digresses and communities lose their ability to support themselves.

Stayed tuned for part 2 of this series, where i will discuss what you can do to help.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Gone Phishing



Phishing scams are increasing at an alarming rate, and phishing scam artists are becoming increasingly sophisticated. What is phishing? Phishing is a type of online fraud where the perpetrators send bulk emails to thousands of people in the hopes of retrieving confidential information from a percentage of its recipients (just like in fishing with an "f", where a fisherman throws a baited hook and waits for a bite).

How do you recognize phishing? In a typical phishing scenario, a person receives an email appearing to have come from a bank, ISP, medical institution, etc. asking to re-supply some important details that, according to email, have been lost or compromised. The email will include a link to a bogus website where the entered information is misappropriated to steal the person's money, credit card details, or other valuable data.

A good general policy to follow is to never enter important personal information on a website solicited by an email. Legitimate institutions will never solicite information from customers using email. However, as phishing tactics become increasingly sophisticated, recognizing them requires more advanced detection methods. Here are a few advanced spoof recognition tips:
  1. Links should relate to legitimate written addresses. If the link is simply an IP address (e.g. http://192.168.2.5) use a whois search to verify it. Whois
  2. Links should not point to a completely different domain (e.g. http://www.clickonme.com instead of http://www.citibank.com)
  3. Look for substitution of letters in the URL (e.g. http://www.micr0soft.com where the letter "o" is substituted with a "zero")
  4. Look for a plausible-sounding but fake domain (e.g. http://www.verify.wachoviaonlineoperations.com)
  5. Look for an address with a username that looks like a domain name (e.g. http://www.citibank.com@phishing.com)
  6. Look for an address that uses a wildcard DNS record to disguise the domain name (e.g. http://www.citibank.com|mhtml:mid://000063/|cid:0659M54K@Re)
$137 million dollars and 14,000 souls were lost to phishing scams in 2004

Monday, January 09, 2006

On Global Warming


As 2006 begins, it is worth noting that 2005 tied 2002 for the warmest year on record. The temperature was up .54 degrees Fahrenheit over the long-term average. What does it mean? No one really knows for certain, but most experts agree that if warming continues, we could be in serious trouble. Theories range from larger, more frequent storms to complete annihilation of life on earth.

So, why is it getting so warm? Ask that question to most people, and they'll respond with "Pollution . . . Greenhouse Effect". While it's true that greenhouse gases do have an effect, they are not wholly responsible for the changes. Greenhouse gases have an equal effect on the entire planet. But, the earth is getting warmer unevenly. The temperature difference has been higher in the northern hemisphere, causing the ice cap to melt. Areas of the planet that have been frozen since the last ice age are melting for the first time. And, since 1978, the arctic has warmed 7 times faster than the southern two-thirds of the planet. (link)

While no one is certain what problems will result from global warming, many experts believe the change in climate is the main reason that 2005 was one of the worst years on record for large, devastating storms (link).

Can anything be done? Experts have been arguing that topic for some time, and some interesting and bizarre theories have surfaced in recent years, including this solution of creating an artificial planetary ring about the Earth to shade it.

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Tux for New Year?

Thinking about making the switch to linux but not sure which distro to go with? Complete this short survey and it will recommend one.

Is it warm in here, or is it just me?

Engineers at the University of Maryland College Park (my alma mater . . . Go Terps!) are working on software that will both help reduce the costs associated with manufacturing heating and cooling equipment, and make the equipment more efficient. End result? Heating and A/C that costs less to manufacture and uses less energy to operate, possibly translating to huge energy savings.

Right now, there are three software modules.
  1. CoilDesigner - allows equipment manufacturers to better model Air cooled heat exchangers which could aid in designing automobile radiators, air conditioners, heat pumps, refrigerators, etc.
  2. VapCyc - A vapor compression cycle simulation tool (the process that makes heat pumps work)
  3. TransRef - aids in designing controls for these systems

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Frickin' Lasers

Ever wonder what is the difference between light from a flashlight and light from a laser? Put simply, light from a laser is more organized than light from a flashlight.

More specifially, if we think of light as a wave, the waves of light from a laser are synched, while the waves of light from a flashlight are scattered (out of step, differing wavelengths). Here is a nice illustration.

Interestingly, increasing the accuracy with which light can be measured was the subject of the work awarded the Nobel Prize in 2005. link

Diamonds are for Never

Recently, I've been spending some time reading up on the problem of 'blood diamonds' or 'conflict diamonds' in Africa. It's a major problem, and a testiment to the disgusting materialism that goes on in our country. Most people don't have or want a clue where these diamonds come from.

Long story short, for 10 years (1991 - 2001), a rebel group called the Revolutionary United Front (R.U.F) took control over Kono, the diamond mining capital of Sierra Leone, without intervention from the rest of the world. During this time, the R.U.F resorted to horrible tactics including murdering and mutilating (amputating hands and feet) civilians. In 2001, the United Nations stepped in, but has been largely unable to stop the senseless killing over illicit diamonds. And, to make matters worse, evidence has been uncovered linking Al-Qaeda to blood diamonds as a means of laundering money to circumvent having their assets frozen.

A few links on the subject:

P-P-P-Powerbook!



As a Craigslist frequenter, I despise the Nigerian scammers. This is one of my favorite "scam-the-scammer" sites.

Click the link towards the top of the page to open a PDF of the entire story. Long read, but well worth it.

Granular Jets


Heinrich Jaeger of the University of Chicago has been working on predicting the properties of granular materials. Granular materials (e.g. sand) possess both solid-like and liquid-like characteristics, but manage to exhibit strange behavior in even the simplest experiements. In some cases, the results are Granular Jets - strangely unique in the physical world, and astoundingly beautiful when photographed.

Blogging is teh suck

All your base are belong to us. W00t!